On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Devarshi Pant <devarshipant@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it too late to reinstate the summary attribute? Formally speaking, it's never too late to make it conforming HTML. > Is not the summary simpler to implement than the suggested alternatives? Depends what problem you're trying to solve. > Whatever happened to the 'pave the cowpaths' motto … Note that the HTML design principles of which "pave the cowpaths" was a part were never ratified by the Working Group. Anyhow, sometimes cows choose their own paths rather than the roads envisaged by spec writers long ago. This motto implies making common practices easier, not perpetuating features that are either uncommonly used or widely misused (both allegations levelled against @summary). You can read the rationale for the Working Group's decision here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Apr/0091.html -- Benjamin Hawkes-LewisReceived on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 10:17:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 18 January 2012 10:17:28 GMT