W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2012

(wrong string) ‚€œcontentinfo‚€ be added on a footer or a p element?

From: Ian Yang <ian.html@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:20:46 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFhBhuM9xV0UUFkQ_eWLGyTCaeF1VuAw=opk_6eTiwPSFCH+6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: MartŪn Szyszlican <martinsz@gmail.com>
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi Martin, thanks for your opinion.

Ian

2012/6/26 MartŪn Szyszlican <martinsz@gmail.com>

> Hi Ian, I'm sure there's more qualified people here to answer, but I, for
> one, agree with your interpretation and I have in fact implemented it just
> like that in one of my websites without giving it much thought.
>
> Nevertheless, it would be cool to know if this is breaking some standard.
>
> MartŪn.
>
>
> 2012/6/26 Ian Yang <ian.html@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> On ARIA demonstration websites, role="contentinfo" is usually added on a
>> footer element.
>>
>> However, footers in modern web design<http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/04/08/footers-in-modern-web-design-creative-examples-and-ideas/>can be creative so that they can also contain things like supplementary
>> navigation links, social website links, or even a newsletter form.
>>
>> Taking the following codes of footer for example. Should
>> role="contentinfo" be added on the footer or the p element?
>>
>> <footer>
>>     <nav>
>>         <ul>
>>             ........
>>             ........
>>             ........
>>             ........
>>             ........
>>         </ul>
>>     </nav>
>>     <form>
>>         ........
>>         ........
>>         ........
>>     </form>
>>     <p>© 2012 Website.com. All rights reserved.</p>
>> </footer>
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Ian Yang
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *MartŪn Szyszlican*
> *clinica-web.com.ar <http://www.clinica-web.com.ar>*
> Desarrollo web usable y accesible
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 05:21:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 June 2012 05:21:16 GMT