W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Accessible content management system

From: Andy Heath <w3@axelrod.plus.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:25:45 +0100
Message-ID: <4E3C1989.3030000@axelrod.plus.com>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

> This is what I agree with - standards are a tool, just as validators
> are. I think the mistake is thinking accessibility can be achieved by
> throwing tech or checklists at the site/app/etc. and think either are
> the last word. Ultimately "accessibility" can only be determined by
> successful use by the target audience and evaluation requires a human
> element that neither validators or standards can cover.

Well said.

Of course there is still much more we can do in standards and improving 
tools and technologies to support that aim.

andy
>
>
> _____________________________________________ Hungry for NIAID
> Information? Check out the NIAID Intranet:
> http://inside.niaid.nih.gov NIAID is tweeting! Follow us at
> http://twitter.com/NIAIDNews
> _____________________________________________ Allison Thurman
> Communications Information Specialist LTS Corporation A Sentrillion
> company NIAID NMWPB (DPIO) 6610 Rockledge Suite 2200, 2211
> 301-443-7248 ******** The information in this e-mail and any of its
> attachments is confidential and may contain sensitive information. It
> should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended
> recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform
> the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage
> devices. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases shall
> not accept liability for any statements made that are sender's own
> and not expressly made on behalf of the NIAID by one of its
> representatives. ********
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net
> [mailto:deborah.kaplan@suberic.net] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011
> 10:36 AM To: Terry Dean Cc: Ian Sharpe; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject:
> Re: Accessible content management system
>
> Terry said:
>
>> I'm afraid this where we disagree. I think web standards are very
>> important
>
> But Terry, Ian did not say  standards are unimportant. He said he
> does not view accessibility "solely in terms of conformance." I've
> gone to countless websites which technically passed validators for
> their conformance but were ultimately unusable or inaccessible.
>
> Terry also said:
>
>> Why bother waving the "accessibility" flag, if you choose to ignore
>> standards?
>
> Perhaps because you care about "accessibility". That is, the ability
> for people with disabilities to use the websites, whether they are
> standards conforming or not.
>
> Standards are an amazing tool in the Web developer's toolbox, and we
> should all use them. But if they are the be-all and end-all -- if we
> ignore accessible but non-conforming sites, or if we praise
> conforming sites which  are purported as unusable by users with
> disabilities -- then we are not using them correctly.
>
> -Deborah
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 5 August 2011 16:26:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 5 August 2011 16:26:27 GMT