W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Section 508 and WCAG 2.0

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:29:06 +0000
Message-ID: <494C2032.2050302@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: Michael Gaigg <mgaigg@esri.com>
CC: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Michael Gaigg wrote:

> 
> In general, is there a channel notifying about legal applications of the 
> WCAG that I can subscribe to? Are the WCAG 2.0 already part of any law 
> (US, EU, UK, Australia, India, etc.)?

UK legislation is qualitative.  Complying with the current WCAG 
guidelines would probably provide a good defence, but nowhere is that 
level of detail in the legislation.



-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Friday, 19 December 2008 22:29:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:29 GMT