W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: HTML5: First Public Working Draft Released

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:05:06 +0000
Message-ID: <47A745C2.4030203@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

Robison, Cole [EISU] wrote:
> I noticed this, too. The scope attribute is still there. Are there cases
> it can't cover, for which headers and/or axis would still be needed?


Although I'm not on the list to which the new HTML discussion was moved, 
my impression from what has leaked onto www-html is that the HTML5 
policy is very market wants and vendor driven and that the only 
accessibility features that survive are those that are already 
consistently implemented across browsers.

HTML5 is basically driven by the vendors, not by W3C.

> 
> 
> 


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2008 17:05:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:27 GMT