Re: Legal Precedent Set for Web Accessibility

> 
> 
> 
> David Woolley wrote:
> >
> > It seems to me to be a major defeat, as it means that no US e-business
> > need have an accessible web site, as long as they refrain from operating
> > physical retail outlets.  Yet another perceived cost in physical retail
> > that is avoided by going online only.
> >   
> Actually, I don't think that was an issue that was addressed by the 
> case. That will likely come in another lawsuit challenging a purely 

What was quoted here was that the pure online part of the site was
excluded from the ruling and allowed to remain faulty.

> online retailer and the need for accessibility.