- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:12:13 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Too, I cannot imagine but just a few instances today where one would use a > blank image alt rather than CSS. This practice is archaic. I don't understand this. In the real world, the only sort of browsers are visual media type, and in the real world most authors let alt default to (illegally) missing or to whatever their authoring tool inserts (e.g. duplicating the src attribute).
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2005 21:13:52 UTC