I might be mistaken, but the 'practice' of using a blank summary attribute in a layout table results from automated accessiblity software checking for it when the table element is detected. So, to pass that 'test,' one uses the blank summary. I think this is a good illustration of the need for human intervention (or judgment) regarding accessibility issues. Too, I cannot imagine but just a few instances today where one would use a blank image alt rather than CSS. This practice is archaic. Finally, as it concerns complex data tables, I think one has to use all the recommended practices [1] -- and, still, there may be problems with accessible content. And a totally unrelated topic -- I have not seen any mention of Nielsen's latest take on PDFs [2], despite the fact that the article is nearly a month old. Is his advice accurate? [1] W3C: Tables in HTML documents http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/tables.html [2] Open New Windows for PDF and other Non-Web Documents http://www.useit.com/alertbox/open_new_windows.html ======================== Bill Williams Communications Specialist USDA Forest Service, Region 5 707.562.9005 wrwilliams@fs.fed.us ======================== David Dorward <david@dorward.me .uk> To Sent by: WAI Interest Group w3c-wai-ig-reques <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> t@w3.org cc Subject 09/22/2005 08:19 Re: Tables and the Summary AM attribute On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 04:09:04PM +0100, Jon Gibbins (dotjay) wrote: > However, you could argue that it's like adding a blank alt attribute. > However, you could argue that it's like saying "no, I haven't forgotten > about the summary attribute, there's just no need for it on this table". A blank alt attribute says "If the image is not available, then replace it with nothing." A blank summary says "The data in this table can be summarised as ''" which is a rather different kettle of fish. Myself, I'll just stick to not using layout tables. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.ukReceived on Thursday, 22 September 2005 16:16:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:14:39 GMT