W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: Fwd: WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 10.4

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:04:54 +0100
Message-ID: <42D3DC16.1040700@splintered.co.uk>
To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> Yep. But the key point is that until software does do a better job, 
> either  authors do some extra work that *should* be done by the 
> software, or users  don't have access to the content :-(
> 
> It's the unpleasant gap between specs and reality, that a section of 
> WCAG  tried to bridge.

I feel this may be yet another task for the newly formed WaSP ATF :)

-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:04:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:22 GMT