W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: accessible banking:

From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:08:06 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <200502011408.j11E86ZX028809@asterix.andreasen.se>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

On  1 Feb, Kelly Pierce wrote:

> specified task.  You may choose not to use Internet Explorer, but in
> 2005 I have not seen an argument saying that it is unreasonable or
> insufficient to require people with disabilities only to use Internet
> Explorer to access online banking services.  It seems like you want 
> access beyond what is required beyond that of the ADA.

  Are we to understand that the ADA allows a bank to require a solution
  provided by one, not associated by the bank, commerical actor? Is
  the cost of operating system and hardware covered by the bank?

  If solution A is delivered ONLY by commercial actor B, and cost money,
  then yes, it would seem -entirely- unreasonable and insufficient. Can
  you elaborate?

 -    Tina Holmboe                    Greytower Technologies
   tina@greytower.net                http://www.greytower.net/
   [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2005 14:08:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:30 UTC