- From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:27:15 -0400
- To: "'Tina Holmboe'" <tina@greytower.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Tina Homboe wrote: > On 6 Jun, Orion Adrian wrote: > >> Well frankly the W3C has been doing a lousy job of late. It took 6 > > I agree - it pains me to look at WCAG 2 and XHTML 2. ... And the latest draft or XHTML has me in an (obvious) fit! > > > Me, and many with me, doubt accessibility - despite it's slightly > skewed direction at the moment - would have seen much > daylight had WAI > not been involved. You can add my name to that list. > > [*] > Not all designs belong on paper, either. The design must be > adapted to > the medium; adapating the medium to the design as so many > has struggled > to do ever since 1990 is a futile effort. Tina, thanks for this! > > [**] > Yes, it could be better. It could be MUCH better. So could browser > support. Amen JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca Phone: 1-613-482-7053
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 15:27:30 UTC