W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: frames and no frames content

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 22:45:44 +0100
Message-ID: <428D0908.7010101@splintered.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

Tina Holmboe wrote:

>   You don't consider Google a major "SE" then? The classic acid test -
>   searching for "your browser does not support frames" - gives me over
>   three *million* hits in Google per seven o'clock CET on the 19th of
>   May 2005.

That shows that Google indexed the frameset's noframes content. It does 
NOT, however, give me any indication whether or not Googlebot then 
proceeded to follow the various frames...so it's a bit of an empty 
argument, I feel...

Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2005 21:45:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:31 UTC