- From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:50:39 -0400
- To: "'Patrick H. Lauke'" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org wrote: > David Woolley wrote: > >> Those tools are intended for real life web pages. > > Yes, but it's a shame that they do not follow the > specifications (while > we're here discussing whether or not it's a hack to rely on situations > in which they do not honour other parts of the specification). Once > again, a chicken and egg problem... I agree... We have browsers that can go from "quirks mode" to "standards mode", why not screen readers and other AT? I realize that this is, on this list anyway, a rhetorical question, but honestly, how do we get guys like Freedom Scientific to start looking at this? JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca 1.866.932.4878 (North America)
Received on Sunday, 3 April 2005 15:50:46 UTC