W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Bobby - a bad tool

From: John Britsios <webmaster@webnauts.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:50:58 +0200
Message-ID: <002701c4bc55$e67d4d30$0300a8c0@webnauts>
To: "Alice Good" <Alice.Good@port.ac.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Dear Alice,

I would recommend CynthiaSays: http://www.cynthiasays.com/

Also have a look at this very interesting web site:
http://uitest.com/en/check/

Kind regards,

John S. Britsios
Principal Web Accessibility Consultant,
Usability Specialist & Trainer


Webnauts Net
Thielenstr. 2
D-33602 Bielefeld
Germany

Tel.:     +49 - (0) 521 - 3051020
Mobile: +49 - (0) 163 - 2025561

Home: http://www.webnauts.net
Email: webmaster@webnauts.net

- Designing with Accessibility and Usability in Mind. -


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alice Good" <Alice.Good@port.ac.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Bobby - a bad tool


>
> What are people's opinions on the usefulness of Bobby as an
> accessibility checker?  I've just been involved in a very ling discussion
> with a lady wh's in the process of writing a report stating it's inability
to
> correctly check for accessibility.  I realise the user checks can be
> tedious but I wasn't aware that there were major issues relating to it.
>
> Can anyone recommend a credible accessbility checker please?
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 18:45:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:18 GMT