W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Does 5.1 absolutely require TH?

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 18:31:50 +0100
Message-ID: <4138AA86.3040809@splintered.co.uk>
To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

Bailey, Bruce wrote:

> Yes I agree, but I don't care about that! <smile />
> What is REQUIRED by 5.1 for conformance to the WCAG on this point?

So, to paraphrase: what's the minimum I can get away with and still put 
the WCAG boyscout badge on my site?
My advice: add the row of headings, and if absolutely necessary use CSS 
to make them unobtrusive.

re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
Received on Friday, 3 September 2004 17:31:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:29 UTC