- From: RUST Randal <RRust@COVANSYS.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:54:18 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Patrick Lauke wrote: > Again, because WCAG is more than just a set of technical > specs relating to syntax, whose validity can be verified > programmatically, checking for accessibility will always > require interpretation by (hopefully) knowledgeable > individuals. Coupled with the huge number of possible "real > world" scenarios, there will always be certain gray areas. > Maybe we need a lot more best practice examples, but at the > core I don't think it will be possible (or easy anyway) to > pin all the points down for definite. This is precisely the problem with WCAG, in any version. It is too ambiguous. If the guidelines were all clear, such as using ALT attributes, they would be more widely understood, accepted and practiced. It needs to get away from ludicrous requirements that require content to be comprehensible -- because that's not a measurable guideline. Therefore it should simply be left up to the developer or designer. Why does WCAG bother mentioning something like that at all? It just creates confusion. ---------- Randal Rust Covansys Corp. Columbus, OH
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 12:54:46 UTC