W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2004

RE: Site Map

From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:19:36 -0500
To: "Matthew Smith" <matt@kbc.net.au>, "WAI Interest Group" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <GKEFJJEKDDIMBHJOGLENEEKEEMAA.foliot@wats.ca>

<opinion>
If every page on your site is directly accessed via your primary navigation
block, then that would in effect be your site map.  IMHO it's not so much
how many pages but rather how easy is it to navigate through your site.  In
your particular case, I would think that a site map would be redundantly
redundant.
</opinion>

JF
--
John Foliot  foliot@wats.ca
Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca
Web Accessibility Testing and Services
http://www.wats.ca   1.866.932.4878 (North America)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Matthew Smith
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 4:58 PM
> To: WAI Interest Group
> Subject: Site Map
>
>
>
> Greetings All
>
> I would be interested to hear if list members consider a site map
> necessary for
> a site that has only five pages (making it 20% bigger).
>
> Cheers
>
> M
>
> --
> Matthew Smith
> Kadina Business Consultancy
> South Australia
> http://www.kbc.net.au
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2004 17:19:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:31 UTC