W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2004

RE: anchors and Bobby

From: P.H.Lauke <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:56:54 -0000
Message-ID: <3A1D23A330416E4FADC5B6C08CC252B98A4456@misnts6.mis.salford.ac.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

> From: Jon Hanna [mailto:jon@hackcraft.net]

> Why are you using name? Backwards compatibility?
> Does anyone know if the need for name is still a pressing backwards
> compatibility issue?

I'd posit that it is if you have a large percentage of your audience
still on Netscape4.x. I personally decided to ditch named anchors, but in
other places it may be a decision that's beyond the web author's control
(and possibly not even because of accessibility, but for no other reason
than "our boss still surfs the interweb powered by Netscrape 4.72").

Patrick
________________________________
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2004 05:56:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:31 UTC