>> I am also surprised at some of the "right's" arguments. Individuals I >> talk to who have disabilities prefer to have access to what everyone else > >how many people with disabilities have you talked to in the third world?? Well, yes. Even the so called 3rd world individuals want access to the latest technology. I thought that was your big issue? You don't want to give them old technology do you? They don't want yesterdays DOS machines any more than any one else. I still see "technical accessibility" separate from "affordability". And I recognize the various stake holder responsibilities, including that of industry to lower costs and that of government to provide funds to purchase technology to bridge the digital divide. >> has access to, including web application using scripting. Most >> individual's who have disabilities do not want to be ghettoized to use >> some other less capable web application. Individuals who have >> disabilities NEED the faster client side scripting just like everyone >> else. They want to come in the front door just like everyone else. > > We are dealing with a WORLD WIDE WEB. and I emphasize the WORLD WIDE part. > in many parts of the world people especially people with disabilities have > very limited bandwidth and service and cannot afford to deal with the HUGE > resources required to use the more "modern" browsers. in at least one > ... > THESE people need access to the web maybe even more than we do. > and we must continue to support their access. > Bob I guess we need to just agree to disagree with our approaches. You're trying to say in the name of affordability that everyone else in the world must maintain backwards compatibility. I would rather make the existing and emerging technologies accessible and at the same time have additional initiatives focus on improving the availability in 3rd world countries. The affordability issues is a lot more than about the technical accessibility. As you point out, it includes the infrastructure - the phone lines in Nicaragua. You always seem to be talking about access to the internet, while I am talking about the compatibility of the web based information and applications with assistive technology. (my personal opinion) Regards, Phill JenkinsReceived on Thursday, 3 June 2004 13:19:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:03:53 GMT