W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: a word for 'accessible', that people get.

From: Isofarro <w3evangelism@faqportal.uklinux.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:16:41 +0100
Message-ID: <001901c354f1$5883f3c0$bf32f7c2@laptop>
To: "Mischa Weiss-Lijn" <Mischa.Weiss-Lijn@oyster.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

From: "Mischa Weiss-Lijn" <Mischa.Weiss-Lijn@oyster.com>
Subject: a word for 'accessible', that people get.


> I am doing some work for a large UK company that sells a range of
> 'accessible' products alongside its standard product range.  They are
> currently under the category of 'accessible products' - BUT in user
testing
> when looking for accessible products NOBODY look in this category!
> 'Accessible' is a great word for people in the industry, but currently it
> doesn't mean a great deal to anyone else.
>
> Can anyone suggest another term?

"Real world ready"

"Realistically usable"

"Ready for use"

"Unencumbered"

"Human friendly"

"Access friendly"

"Access ready"

"Accessified"
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 06:15:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:10 GMT