- From: Lauke PH <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:25:17 +0100
- To: "Mischa Weiss-Lijn" <Mischa.Weiss-Lijn@oyster.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Probably depends on the kind of product... 'universal' perhaps ? Patrick ________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Webmaster / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: Mischa Weiss-Lijn [mailto:Mischa.Weiss-Lijn@oyster.com] > Sent: 25 July 2003 10:13 > To: 'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org' > Subject: a word for 'accessible', that people get. > > > > Hi, > > I am doing some work for a large UK company that sells a range of > 'accessible' products alongside its standard product range. They are > currently under the category of 'accessible products' - BUT > in user testing > when looking for accessible products NOBODY look in this category! > 'Accessible' is a great word for people in the industry, but > currently it > doesn't mean a great deal to anyone else. > > Can anyone suggest another term? We tried 'special needs' > but the client > isn't happy with that because the phrase has negative > connotations in the > UK. > > Many thanks, > > Dr. Mischa Weiss-Lijn > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________________ > Internet communications are not secure and therefore Oyster > Partners Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the > contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are > solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent > those of Oyster Partners Ltd. > >
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 05:26:25 UTC