W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: empty metadata elements

From: Scarlett Julian (ED) <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:56:59 -0000
Message-ID: <F9BE3B1AB649D311A573009027852E4D02879532@EDUC_MXS>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

LOL - oops <sheepish look /> 
Of course there is no document that defines the accessibility element. There is a DC working group looking at the potential use of metadata in accessibility and it's an element in the e-Govt Metadata Standard(e-GMS) but I'm so used to putting "DC." in front of my element names that somehow that one inexplicably slipped through the usual rigid control I have over my keyboard ;P 

Well spotted that man ;-)

J.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Hanna [mailto:jon@spin.ie]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:13 PM
> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: RE: empty metadata elements
> 
> 
> 
> > As an afterthought what does <meta name="DC.accessibility" 
> > content="" /> say to people on this list. To me it says that the 
> > page/resource complies to no known accessibility standard.
> 
> To me it says my knowledge of DC has a gap! :(
> Which document defined the "accessibility" element?
> 
The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee.  If you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network.  If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible.
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 10:51:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:08 GMT