W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:10:10 +1100
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
Message-Id: <0B99587C-3885-11D7-995D-000A95678F24@sidar.org>

I agree with Jim on both points - and said so last time this was 
discussed in this forum - see the 4-message thread starting at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2003JanMar/0182 (two 
weeks ago).

On Wednesday, Feb 5, 2003, at 06:39 Australia/Melbourne, Jim Ley wrote:

>
>
> "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:77FBB387-3877-11D7-A5B3-0003939B5AD0@btinternet.com...
>>
>> We use absolute positioning so I'm wondering what the theory is on 
>> this?
>> Is there any explicit separation? seems unlikely :-(
>
> If you're positioning with CSS, then you can easily provide characters 
> which
> are hidden, or positioned elsewhere when css is enabled, this 
> requirement
> obviously only applies to the non CSS-P situation.
>
>> and finally SVG, how are links supposed to be separated in what has 
>> the
>> potential to be a fine mess?
>
> User Agents for SVG have to cope with this in a different way, they 
> are very
> different mark-up languages, and techniques don't directly translate.
>
> Jim.
>
>
>
--
Charles McCathieNevile           charles@sidar.org
Fundación SIDAR                       http://www.sidar.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 16:10:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:08 GMT