W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: User agent support of SUMMARY attribute in tables

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:31:09 -0500
To: Steven McCaffrey <smccaffr@MAIL.NYSED.GOV>, pjenkins@us.ibm.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-id: <005e01c2c255$32620ad0$6501a8c0@handsontech>

are we not told also in the guidelines though not to use tables for lay out
or is this not at least discouraged?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven McCaffrey" <smccaffr@MAIL.NYSED.GOV>
To: <poehlman1@comcast.net>; <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: User agent support of SUMMARY attribute in tables


Hi all:

My interpretation of,

"5.5 Provide summaries for tables. [Priority 3] For example, in HTML, use
the "summary" attribute of the TABLE element."
has three parts.


First, it has lowest priority, priority 3 so only important if you are
trying for AAA (triple A).
Second, since there is no qualifier before "tables" I assume the text that
follows applies to all tables, data and layout.
Thirdly, it just says summary attribute is an example if using HTML,
presumably allowing non-html ways to provide a summary (is there a CSS way
to do this?)
What 5.5  requires  is a summary.
I interpret "For example, in HTML"
as implying "if not using HTML, a different example applies".
If using HTML, then use the summary attribute as the mechanism for providing
the summary.
So, in my opinion, Bobby or any accessibility tool using 5.5 as written
above should flag any table using HTML to give a summary that does not have
a summary attribute.
I'll have to check the techniques document to see if any other HTML method
other than the summary attribute is given and what non-HTML examples there
might be.

Just my 2 cents,

Steve
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 15:33:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:08 GMT