W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: to js or not to js?

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:26:35 -0500
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-id: <00c101c2be58$26e73000$6501a8c0@handsontech>

how do you configure js and cookies on a per site basis?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Voelcker" <asp@tvw.net>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: to js or not to js?



Hi David,

> For those suggesting that one should rely on js being turned off in order
to
> provide non js functionality, this problematic in that in many cases, js
is
> needed and to have to turn off the js in a browser in order to achieve
> accessibility to a site specifically would break accessibility for other
> sites if inadvertantly left off.

I try to take the stance that I will use js on a site, but will make sure
that
it still works for people that have it turned off.  I do the same for
cookies.

The only time when we 'insist' on js or cookies being turned on is for
subscription based sites.  With the latest browsers it is pretty easy to
configure js and cookies on a per site basis.

Cheers,

Julian
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 13:43:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:08 GMT