W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: Skip Nav (was RE: "Think EUO, not SEO"/Google)

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 08:41:58 -0400
To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-id: <000f01c33272$58f3a950$6401a8c0@handsontech>

The best use for an aural css is for aural devices for delivery.  Since
there are so many different screen readers and since they controll the
presentation themselves, aural css does not yeild anything for them.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: Skip Nav (was RE: "Think EUO, not SEO"/Google)



> This is a problem with screenreaders.  :)  Really, the CSS specification

No.  It's a chicken and egg problem.  Screenreaders won't handle aural
style sheets in preference to visual ones until the majority of
authors use them properly, and one reason why they don't do that is
that screenreaders don't handle aural ones.  The main reason, of course,
is that authors don't care about screenreaders.
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2003 08:45:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:09 GMT