W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Access Keys

From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 08:43:55 -0400
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <GKEFJJEKDDIMBHJOGLENOEPDDLAA.foliot@wats.ca>

Julian,

As mentioned elsewhere, your mileage may vary.  However, based upon research
we undertook in the summer of 2002 (and yes, this has been in the threads
before), I have reached the conclusion that the use of ACCESSKEYS is more
trouble than it's worth.  See:
http://wats.ca/resources/accesskeys/19
for all the gritty details.

Cheers.

--
John Foliot  foliot@wats.ca
Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca
Web Accessibility Testing and Services
http://www.wats.ca   1.866.932.4878 (North America)





> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Julian Voelcker
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:15 AM
> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Access Keys
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Access Keys and would like to know more.  I understand the
> principles, but am unsure about the best way to implement them.
>
> Can any of you recommend any good resources explaining which keys are
> available and the best way to implement them?
>
> Links to good implementations would also be handy.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Julian Voelcker
> Cirencester, United Kingdom
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 2 June 2003 08:43:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:09 GMT