Except that their definition of accessibility is "does it have a text-only interface" - there is nothing mentioned about whether there is support for authors to create content that is accessible, or whether anything more sophisticated than a text-only interface (for example the use of text equivalents for functions and images provided) is available. But a good resource anyway to start from. Cheers Charles On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Denise Wood wrote: For those of you who have expressed interest in information comparing different e-learning platforms I have come across another relevant site: http://www.c2t2.ca/landonline/evalapps.asp The structure used for the reviews is very comprehensive and there is a comprehensive review of WebCT 3.7 but the review on Blackboard is lacking in detail. Also appears to be an older version of Blackboard that has been reviewed. Several other e-learning platforms are reviewed at this site and well worth checking out and bookmarking to check for regular updates of the reviews. Sincerely DeniseReceived on Sunday, 31 March 2002 18:30:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:01 GMT