W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are

From: Simon White <simon.white@jkd.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:28:43 -0000
Message-ID: <FDFC0668A850D246BC4231715D94904E0CD826@uranus.jkd.co.uk>
To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
There are also those of us who have scripting turned off on occasion rather than all the time. That has got to skew the figures somewhat...

-----Original Message-----
From: David Woolley [mailto:david@djwhome.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 22:01
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: These are accessible? I'm not sure they are

> (for example, the 13% of people who disable scripts even though the browser
> is capable of running scripts)

I'd be interested in a source for this.  I'm one of them, but I reckon
that I'm the only one in my company, making the figure about 1.6%, and
I would have thought that in the mass market the figure was lower.

It would be rather telling if true, given the number of even blue chip
sites (latest I found was KPMG) that blank screen without scripting, 
and the even greater number that are un-navigable without it.

Most businesses assume that 99% of the people dumb enough to do business
with them have scripting on.  Maybe the people with scripting off either
ignore advertising or can't afford to buy.

VirusChecked by the Incepta Group plc
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 04:28:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:18 UTC