W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Creative (?) solution for redundant links

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:10:09 -0500 (EST)
To: Mike Scott <mscott2@msfw.com>
cc: "'WAI (E-mail)'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0203111204480.20409-100000@tux.w3.org>
Problem is that  users need a way of finding out what things can be triggered
by an onClick - this is a specific requirement of user agent accessibility
guidelines: http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10/guidelines.html#tech-nav-just-active
- so the solution doesn't really solve the problem, and instead leaves the
user, in a good implementation, in the situation of finding out there is
something that uses a non-standard link method that is not written to be
accessiblt and for which there is no helpful information available.

cheers

Chaals

On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Mike Scott wrote:

  We've talked a few times about the problems of the common "image
  followed by text" link situation -- in particular, that we may want to
  allow sighted users to click on either the image or text, but we'd
  rather avoid making screen reader users hear the same link text repeated
  twice (the image's alt text followed by the text link).

  What if we did something like this (HTML code follows):

  <img src="image.gif" alt="" onclick="document.location='newpage.html';">
  <a href="newpage.html">Link Text</a>

  (i.e., use a javascript "onclick" on the image to load the new page if
  the image is clicked.)

  The image alt wouldn't show up in a screen reader's links list, and with
  alt = null, it wouldn't be read; at the same time, if a sighted user
  (whose browser supported javascript) clicked on the image, it would act
  as if it were a link. Without javascript, clicking the image would
  simply do nothing, but the text link would still work.

  Of course, this scenario would only apply if the image and the text link
  were exactly redundant, and when the layout of the page was preventing
  us from simply putting a single link element around both.

  Thoughts???

  Mike




-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI  fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 12:10:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:01 GMT