W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Images in Headers

From: B.K. DeLong <bkdelong@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 11:00:47 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020201105629.03170ec0@pop.earthlink.net>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 10:28 AM 02/01/2002 -0500, Randal Rust wrote:
>Personally, I don't this that images should be used for headers, unless you
>need a specific font.  Then you could use the "alt" tag.  Right?

The only reason there should be an image in a header is because it's part 
of it, as Chaarls referenced. If you need a specific font, then you should 
be using inline or externally referenced style. Such as:

p.header {
         font-weight: bold;
         font-size: 110%;
         text-decoration: underline;
         }

The reference it with <p class="header"><img src="myimage.gif" alt="My 
Image"></p>. Even Netscape 4.x handles most font-related styles at this point.

Just my $0.02.


--
B.K. DeLong
bkdelong@pobox.com
617.877.3271

http://www.brain-stream.com               Play.
http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org        Potter.
http://www.attrition.org                       Security.
http://www.artemisiabotanicals.com     Herb.
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 10:58:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:00 GMT