W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Opinions please - flash site, flash navigation - but accessible alternative

From: Jon Hanna <jon@spinsol.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:12:34 -0000
To: "W3c_Access" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBLCBLIMDOPKMOPHLHGECNDMAA.jon@spinsol.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> What are peoples thoughts on this? would you advise agains this - 
> or does it
> not matter - as long as the alternative is accessible?

If there is no clear way to distinguish between which site is better
(and there isn't other than trying both versions) it can be a
difficult decision to make. This is bad enough for the majority
(unless one has a bias for or against Flash), but for people with
learning difficulties could potentially be very bad indeed.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBPExMAoFpv9f1Mr0YEQJcqACg6Wb9pqTu0B0DfFUSOBUHIxn+cLQAoLow
1Ajg/v3Vbup24sO131urBH0K
=pCoc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 21 January 2002 12:13:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:00 GMT