W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:55:39 -0000
Message-ID: <021501c216c7$72aae2e0$ca969dc3@emedia.co.uk>
To: "WAI List \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

"John Foliot - bytown internet" <foliot@bytowninternet.com>
> We did a test, and while HTML 4.01 Trans. was decent, and HTML4.01
> even better, pages authored to XHTML strict were virtually flawless.
> the Blackberry is not quite as ubiquitous as the Palm (yet), but it
ain't no
> sci-fi toy either... there are plenty of them out there all ready.  As
> content owner I would want my information available to the broadest
> audience (right?), and so, whenever possible, I would look to use
> only because it does just that.

but for Microsoft Pocket IE, on the iPaq renders the XML processing
instruction, so that clearly does not understand xhtml.

What was the distinction between HTML 4.01 strict and xhtml 1.0 strict
(xhtml 1.1 is clearly not an option as that should not be served as

Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 08:58:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:19 UTC