- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 03:17:33 +0100 (BST)
- To: Access Systems <accessys@smart.net>
- cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Access Systems wrote: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Nick Kew wrote: > > what I meant was "give me the URL of a site you think is well done or > exemplifies what you are discussing. A site that is well done doesn't need to be fixed by an accessibility proxy. It's badly-done sites I'm looking to fix! Select a few sites whose use of frames makes them difficult, and tell me if the proxy improves things for you. > I run Lynx on linux. it is a very basic system that is generally > accepted as the basic accessible system (as per sec 508) that needs to > provided access. Yes, I know it well. And indeed, a framed site without adequate noframes content can be most annoying in it. -- Nick Kew Available for contract work - Programming, Unix, Networking, Markup, etc.
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 22:17:37 UTC