W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities

From: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 19:16:26 +0000
Message-Id: <200112261612.fBQGCkH21535@post.cnt.ru>
To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@home.com>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 15:19, David Poehlman wrote:
|   unfortunately or fortunately, there are many reasons why lynx is pivotal
|   and we are lucky if it is the one chosen as minimal.

try 

http://www.nbcolympics.com/,
or
http://www.nbcolympics.com/x/f/frame.htm?u=/news/nbcomain_front.asp
with Lynx :-)

// I am not saying that Lynx is bad, nbcolympics.com is crap. But anyway...
 
|
|   ----- Original Message -----
|   >like what LYNX does so much better.   especially it is "Clean and Fast"
|
|   I'm not stating a popularity contest of browsers here -- I like Lynx
|   myself -- but I feel that the limited capabilities of Lynx make it a
|   poor baseline for accessibility.  It is too limited of a browser to
|   make it the minimal browser; it doesn't meet the basic requirements
|   of a 21st century web access software system.
|
|   --Kynn

-- 

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html
KDE mini-Themes
http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/
Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2001 11:13:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:59 GMT