W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities

From: Phillip Pi <philpi@apu.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 14:32:39 -0800 (PST)
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112251431170.30785-100000@home.apu.edu>
> > Lynx support for major web standards is lagging far behind where it
> > could be.  Lynx is roughly at the stage of, say, Netscape 2 or so.
> I guess that is a matter of opinion, it is pretty good at what it does and
> while I have a later version of netscape, I so rarely run it because I so
> like what LYNX does so much better.   especially it is "Clean and Fast"
> so far I have yet to find a browser that is better there.  not to mention
> that access is almost a "gimmi" 

I like Lynx and Links because I want just quick information. I don't need
graphics and want to wait (if I am on a dial-up connection). I agree that 
it is quick and fast. I only care about information. Graphics are nice 
only if I need them.
Received on Tuesday, 25 December 2001 17:32:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:15 UTC