W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 11:41:49 -0500
Message-ID: <004b01c184be$3c5f0f40$c2f20141@mtgmry1.md.home.com>
To: "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
perhaps it was the understanding of how you enterpretted the text.  I
enterpretted it as you state below but want to make clear that it is not
the same as the last resort case.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net>
To: <phoenixl@sonic.net>; <poehlman1@home.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired


If I recall correctly, the interpretation I was given was that
a server could provide different forms of a web page to serve
different user needs.  Since this is maked as a consensus item,
it would seem to have been accepted by the GL team.

If people's interpretations of the text are varying, perhaps it might
indicate that the text needs some tweaking.


> as I understand the excerpt, it is a server/client side choice issue.
> this is enterpretted to me as being that content is served from the
> bucket and the user has the choice.  I see no reason why we should
> the bar.  The guidelines are still in draft so I wouldn't relie on
> anything in them to be deffinitive on the final.
Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 11:41:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:15 UTC