W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site

From: Hewitt, Denise <Denise.Hewitt@idea.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:17:06 -0600
Message-ID: <9CAB32B1B967BA49B0B7675A02EBB9308B949B@TX047MX2KPROD01.idea.com>
To: "'Kynn Bartlett '" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, "'Debi Orton '" <oradnio@albany.net>
Cc: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org '" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

I think you have a really good point. But I would also like to point out
that the Sydney Olympics had a serious issue with accessibility, and while
the current site may be better, it does not appear (from what I have been
able to decipher) that the attitude has improved.

This may not be the best forum for discussion of such sites. My question is
this - where *is* the best forum? And if one does not exist, is there reason
enough to create one?



-----Original Message-----
From: Kynn Bartlett
To: Debi Orton
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Sent: 10/30/2001 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: OT (slightly): Salt Lake '02 Webmaster: Inaccessible site

This all still really bothers me.  I dislike the use of the WAI lists
in this manner -- finding and identifying and shaming creators of bad
sites in public -- because I think it weakens our case if we become a
virtual lynch mob rather than a useful educational resource.  We can
get more done if we help and teach rather than if we attack and

I don't disagree that this person could use some accessibility
training, but I don't think it's good for anyone to have their flaws
as a web designer publicly "exposed" or debated in a forum such as
this, unless they specifically request a critique or assistance.  It
only makes _us_ look bad, and makes _them_ less likely to listen to


Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2001 01:17:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:15 UTC