W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: article: The beauty of single columned sequential text"

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 11:51:47 -0400
Message-ID: <00a601c14db5$a6c2fb20$2cf60141@mtgmry1.md.home.com>
To: "Danny Ayers" <danny@isacat.net>, "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
This has more to do with sequence of content rather than where you go
from the page.  it is still just as easy to hop around the page or go
somewhere else that is indicated.  The difference though, is that the
page is much clearer from a usability standpoint to many but not
necessarily all readers.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Ayers" <danny@isacat.net>
To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: article: The beauty of single columned sequential text"

Now at : http://www.clickz.com/design/write_onl/article.php/896561

A quick comment, the author's key point is :

"The delivery of your key messages, in the right sequence, within a
central column of text can work wonders."

In many cases, this probably holds true. But I think it should be
as a general rule, among other reasons, for one pointed to by the author
the piece : "A single principal column of text makes life easy for the
reader and gives you a great deal more control over the sequence in
information is delivered to the reader."

Controlling the sequence? Doesn't this rather undermine the benefits
by hypertext in the first place? If we wish to deliver propaganda, all
and good, if we wish to deliver information for the benefit of the
then surely allowing them to control the flow will be the aim.


Danny Ayers

>Subject: article: The beauty of single columned sequential text"
>can be found at:
>Hands-on Technolog(eye)s
>Touching The Internet
>voice: 301.949.7599
Received on Friday, 5 October 2001 11:52:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:14 UTC