W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: Single vs. multiple sites for accessibility

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:46:04 -0400 (EDT)
To: Pat Byrne <pat@glasgowwestend.co.uk>
cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107051843150.32701-100000@tux.w3.org>
The thing I noted as David's really interesting point was about how linking
is done - it is possible to have "natural linking in the flow" when content
is stored in a database, but many tools don't lend themselves to doing that
very readily, unfortunately.

Still, many tools is not all tools, and there are some good things out there,
and good ways of handling content.



On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Pat Byrne wrote:


  It is possible to have the best of both worlds. Store the all the bits of
  your site in a content management systems, all in standard HTML (because
  your content management system can link up with other HTML generation
  programs or text editors), publish pages to a static server or generate them
  One XML document is just like one record in a database. If you want to have
  a manageable XML storage/publishing system I think you will still need a
  database of some sort.


Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 18:47:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:13 UTC