W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Bobby rating over rated

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 07:47:16 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010205074515.00b0e810@garth.idyllmtn.com>
To: "Paul Davis" <paul@ten-20.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 12:21 AM 2/5/2001 , Paul Davis wrote:
>Pleasantly surprised to note we are singing from the same hymn sheet on
>this, ( did I really use that expression? sorry) Ten-20 recently lost out on
>a lucrative contract/web build because I stupidly mentioned in the tender
>that a Bobby compliant logo was not a vital requirement and did not always
>signify accessibility anyway. 

That's a definite shame.  I would not say that Bobby itself is
over-rated -- the program is amazing for what it does -- but rather
that Bobby -compliance- is overrated by many who want to simplify
the web accessibility problem too much and boil it down to one
variable which can be easily tested.  I.e., does it pass or not pass
Bobby?

Even the CAST people know and state that this isn't so simple, and
yet people persist in caring more about a stupid cartoon logo than,
for example, testing their sites by having people with disabilities
try to use them.

--Kynn


Kynn Bartlett
Sr. Engineering Product Leader
Team Edapta
Reef North America
Tel +1 909-674-5225
___________________________________
BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
___________________________________
http://www.reef.com
Received on Monday, 5 February 2001 12:22:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:53 GMT