- From: David Clark <david@davidsaccess.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:47:56 -0500
- To: "Marti" <marti@agassa.com>, "Robert Neff" <rneff@bbnow.net>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: "W3c-Wai-Ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Marti, There is: Bobby is only one step in the process of making a site accessible to as many people as possible. Since there are some important aspects of accessible Web page design that can not yet be tested by Bobby, CAST recommends that Web developers use Bobby only as a first step to ensure accessible Web page design. Please review the How-to section and the Bobby Documentation for more information. From http://www.cast.org/Bobby/WhatisBobby907.cfm dc --------------- David M. Clark 16 Harcourt Street, #2I Boston, MA 02116 617-859-3069 : 401-679-0239 (eFax) : 617-290-3410 (cell) http://www.davidsaccess.com david@davidsaccess.com -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Marti Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 3:11 PM To: Robert Neff; Kynn Bartlett Cc: W3c-Wai-Ig Subject: Re: bobby compliant I have to agree with Kynn on this one. Bobby is a useful tool, but too often mis-used and mis-understood. Wouldn't it be nice to have a short, clear explanation of why passing Bobby does not mean a site is accessible? Marti
Received on Monday, 5 February 2001 10:46:04 UTC