W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: bobby compliant

From: Marti <marti@agassa.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 15:11:22 -0500
Message-ID: <007f01c08ee6$a5441a60$a3d6db3f@cais.net>
To: "Robert Neff" <rneff@bbnow.net>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Cc: "W3c-Wai-Ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

I have to agree with Kynn on this one.  Bobby is a useful tool, but too
often mis-used and mis-understood. Wouldn't it be nice to have a short,
clear explanation of why passing Bobby does not mean a site is accessible?
Marti

Received on Sunday, 4 February 2001 14:50:02 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Woolley: "Re: HTML validator"
Previous message: Terje Bless: "RE: HTML validator"
In reply to: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: bobby compliant"
Next in thread: David Clark: "RE: bobby compliant"
Reply: David Clark: "RE: bobby compliant"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:53 GMT