- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 08:15:54 -0800
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Davey Leslie <davey@inx-jp.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 3:25 AM -0500 1/19/01, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >I don't think Kynn has said XHTML is a waste of time. I do see him saying >that XML in general is more useful than HTML in general. As it happens, I >find it easiest to collaborate with people if I use a form of HTML, and I >find it easiest to actually have stuff that works for proper semantic control >and so on if I use XML. The result is that I get pretty much the best of both >worlds with XHTML (I use rather more attributes and fewer elements to carry >semantics than I would really like, but it's a compromise for the real >world). Hi Chaalz, of course the "right" way to do it is to use XML for content storage and XSL to transform it into XHTML for collaboration and display purposes. :) Of course, no, I don't do that myself outside of work projects -- although I don't put much on the web these days besides my personal web site anyway. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Friday, 19 January 2001 11:55:21 UTC