- From: Kathleen Anderson <kathleen.anderson@po.state.ct.us>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:06:37 -0500
- To: "Tina Marie Holmboe" <tina@elfi.elfi.org>, <jim@jimthatcher.com>, "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi: In FrontPage 2000, you can set the content-type meta tag by adding it to the normal.htm template used for all new pages. See: http://www.cmac.state.ct.us/access/tutorials/defaultdoctype.htm Then in your web, Tools | Web Settings | Language, set the Default page encoding to <none>. Kathleen Anderson, Webmaster Office of the State Comptroller 55 Elm Street Hartford, Connecticut 06106 voice: 860.702.3355 fax: 860.702.3634 e-mail: kathleen.anderson@po.state.ct.us URL: http://www.osc.state.ct.us/ URL ACCESS: http://www.cmac.state.ct.us/access/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Tina Marie Holmboe <tina@elfi.elfi.org> To: <jim@jimthatcher.com>; David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 11:07 AM Subject: Re: Fw: Disturbing trend in tables > On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 06:57:22PM -0600, Jim Thatcher wrote: > > > The request was for "specific" examples. I would like to see those too. > > I've actually manage to get my boss to give me a FP 2000 to play with, > so lets see what we can find. > > * Test #1. Write a little bit of text, and click the 'increase indent' > button twice. > > <blockquote> > <blockquote> > <p>This is a test</p> > </blockquote> > </blockquote> > > Folks, BLOCKQUOTE still does not produce 'indentation', even if some > notious UAs do. It *might* - in a smart screen-reader - produce something > aking to " bla, bla, bla, and I quote <insert content of blockquote> "; > which would be *ehem* so cool. No, it isn't incorrect HTML, but it sure > isn't a good practice. > > * Test #2. Lets press CR a few times. > > <p> </p> > > <p> </p> > > <p> </p> > > <p> </p> > > <p> </p> > > Ehm. Well. Um. Why ? > > > ... and it sets the default charset of new documents to windows-1252. Why > not iso-8859-1 or unicode ? > > Ok, so far I've not found any *HTML errors*, but some of these things may > just present accessibility difficulties IMHO. > > -- > - Tina > > > >
Received on Friday, 12 January 2001 12:07:48 UTC