W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: 10.4 Re: Checkpoints 10.4 and 10.5

From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 01:38:45 -0400
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF5B43C0B9.7A8AE415-ON86256A5E.001E7931@raleigh.ibm.com >
Kelly wrote:
> This sounds like a big shift from what I understood this check point
> to be originally about.

PJ: Yes, but that it has been where the thread is going.

> ... I'm not saying it is a bad idea, but I for one would hope it
> is a technique of last resort.
> Then again from strictly a usability perspective some folks find it
> helpful to have the default text there, disabled or not.

PJ: I agree.  As I said earlier <quote>
     not leave them empty in <strong> some </strong> situations.
     priority 3 [read last resort]
     example techniques that would lead to better usability
     <end quote>
Received on Friday, 1 June 2001 01:38:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:12 UTC