W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: 10.4 Re: Checkpoints 10.4 and 10.5

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 22:55:23 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200105312155.f4VLtNM22071@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> I don't want to get this off topic, but we simply recommend a frames 
> supporting browser, although our page does read fine in Lynx. The pixels 

Note that neither W3C nor ISO reccommend frames (not in XHTML 1.1 or 
ISO HTML and never in anything except the transitional alternative in
earlier W3C HTMLs; they are in one of the modules in modular

> can be resized in IE when the proper accessibility options are implemented 
> (ie. "Ignore font size specified on Web pages").

Pages should work with "use largest font", which is something that can
be left permanently enabled; "ignore document font sizes" has to be turned
on and off on a page by page basis if you are not to lose too much 
for pages that do scale well.

This is why the WCAG guidelines say don't use absolute (including point)
font sizes.
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2001 18:07:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:12 UTC