W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Access keys

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:49:53 -0400 (EDT)
To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104231547410.26598-100000@tux.w3.org>
In my opinion there is a problem with the way access keys are specified -
basically they require the browser to do some work that almost no browser
does (iCab is one exception, and there are ways of using CSS to get other
browsers to be a bit more forthcoming) because it doesn't actually say that
anywhere in the spec.

This is (I think) treated in the User Agent Guidelines. Which are in Last
call, so if anyone is  reviewing and looking for things to think about...
http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10

cheers

Chaals

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, David Woolley wrote:

  > PSS  Perhaps XHTML needs a tags or attributes for textual information?

  With Access Keys you have a problem that they won't be fully supported
  until fully used and one of the factors in their not being fully used
  is they aren't fully supported.

  However, it seems to me that there is a fairly obvious way of labelling
  their function in HTML:  put a title attribute on the element that
  is accessed by the key.  It's then up to the browser to provide a table
  of access keys from this information.

  In this case, there seems little conflict with the perception that
  title always means a "tool tip" pop up display.


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 23 April 2001 15:49:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:54 GMT