W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: !important

From: Frank Tobin <ftobin@uiuc.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:08:35 -0500 (CDT)
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104101157350.79590-100000@palanthas.neverending.org>
Kynn Bartlett, at 09:50 -0700 on Tue, 10 Apr 2001, wrote:

    In my opinion, while the ability in CSS to override creator styles
    is a nice thing, I feel that it's not a good "solution" because it
    requires users to understand how configure their software in a way
    that is not very apparent nor easy to do.  This introduces an
    extra hurdle to accessibility -- "hi, user, you need to learn CSS
    to write yourself a stylesheet" or even "hi, user, you need to
    learn how to choose your own stylesheet after downloading it" if
    using a library of CSS written by someone else -- and puts too
    much _technical_ burden on the end users.

There is an argument, though, that only with more knowledge, may users be
able to free themselves.

In order to effect styles that CSS is capable of accomplishing, users need
to be able to express what they want to have done in some coherent manner.
To try to come up with a means for users to express what they want done
with their personal stylesheets without actually haivng a working of CSS,
would be, in effect, coming up with a language parallel to CSS. And given
that CSS is itself a fairly minimal, simple language for the most
rudimentary tasks, I think it is a good syntax for users expressing the
style they want.

Sure, there may be frontends for manipulating a CSS file, but the basic
notion of how CSS applies to elements, and what elements exist, are fairly
intrinsic applying CSS effectively.

--
Frank Tobin		http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2001 13:08:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:54 GMT