W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: css and width in pixels

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 13:44:32 -0700
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000612133851.009a3460@mail.idyllmtn.com>
To: David Poehlman <David.Poehlman@usmint.treas.gov>
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 07:34 AM 6/12/2000 , David Poehlman wrote:
>how does this affect accessability?
>I'll research it but it is a good question.

Pixel-width specifications in CSS have the potential to 
decrease accessibility to people with low vision, who may
have specified a larger font size.  Designs that are based
on "absolute units" such as pixels do not scale up well when
the user changes the font size -- a better approach would 
be to use "relative units" such as ems (the width of a
capital letter M) or exes (the height of lowercase x).

These scale relative to the base font, and thus if you change
the size of that, the rest of the page should stay in
proportion.

Is this what you meant?

PS:  Hey, David, since when do you have an address at the
usmint?


-- 
Kynn Bartlett  <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                   http://www.kynn.com/
Director of Accessibility, Edapta                  http://www.edapta.com/
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet      http://www.idyllmtn.com/
AWARE Center Director                         http://www.awarecenter.org/
I'm Not Looking For A Job                         http://kynn.com/resume/
Received on Monday, 12 June 2000 16:49:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:49 GMT